FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 13: Real Options and Other Topics in Capital Budgeting

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 21

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

If a firm practices capital rationing, this means that it is accepting fewer projects than would be theoretically optimal; hence, it is not maximizing its theoretical value.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 22

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis--where a project's cash flows are estimated and then discounted to obtain an expected NPV--has been the cornerstone of capital budgeting since the 1950s. However, in recent years, it has been demonstrated that DCF techniques do not always lead to proper capital budgeting decisions due to the existence of real options.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 23

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Traditionally, an NPV analysis assumes that projects will be accepted or rejected, which implies that they will be undertaken now or never. However, in practice, companies sometimes have a third choice--delay the decision until later, when more information will be available.

The optimal capital budget is the size of the capital budget where the rate of return on the marginal project is equal to the marginal cost of capital.

Capital rationing is the situation in which a firm can raise only a specified, limited amount of capital regardless of how many good projects it has.

Which one of the following is an example of a "flexibility" option?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

It is not possible for abandonment options to decrease a project's risk as measured by the project's coefficient of variation.

A firm's optimal capital budget consists of all independent projects with positive NPVs plus those mutually exclusive projects that have the highest positive NPVs.

Norris Production Company (NPC) NPC is considering whether to make the investment today or to wait a year to find out about the FDA's decision. If it waits a year, the project's up-front cost at t = 1 will remain at $2,500, the subsequent cash flows will remain at $750 per year if the competitor's product is rejected and $50 per year if the alternative product is approved. However, if NPC decides to wait, the subsequent cash flows will be received only for six years (t = 2 ... 7) This is a risky project, so a WACC of 16.0% is to be used. If NPC chooses to wait a year before proceeding, how much will this increase or decrease the project's expected NPV in today's dollars? (Hint: Find the NPV for "go now" and for "wait," then discount the wait-NPV back for one year since it will occur one year later, and then find the difference between the two NPVs.)

Gleason Research regularly takes real options into account when evaluating its proposed projects. Specifically, it considers the option to abandon a project whenever it turns out to be unsuccessful (the abandonment option) , and it evaluates whether it is better to invest in a project today or to wait and collect more information (the investment timing option) . Assume the proposed projects can be abandoned at any time without penalty. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

The following are all examples of real options that are discussed in the text: (1) protection options, (2) flexibility options, (3) timing options, and (4) abandonment options.

Traditionally, an NPV analysis assumes that projects will be accepted or rejected, which implies that they will be undertaken now or never. However, in practice, companies sometimes have a third choice--delay the decision until later, when more information will be available. Because the analysis extends out at least one additional year from the original analysis, it is unlikely that the firm would ever delay a project--particularly given the loss of the "first mover advantage."